- Hide menu

Can’t Please Everyone (Nor Should You Try)

Should the goal of  brand­ing work be that it appeal to every­one? Exclud­ing no one? To the con­trary, pre­sent­ing work that really res­onates, that turns on a mean­ing­ful per­cent­age of your audi­ence is far more effec­tive than work that 100% of peo­ple find merely OK. Work that res­onates has “hooks” that bur­row into  our psy­ches, and is far more likely to be dis­cussed, and remembered.

Com­ments

2 Responses to “Can’t Please Everyone (Nor Should You Try)”

  1. Should the goal of brand­ing work be that it appeal to every­one? Exclud­ing no one?”

    No. Brand­ing work should appeal to those to whom you wish to con­nect (with the brand).

    To that end it neces­si­tates a brand­ing agency that may not be attracted to it’s own brand­ing work, namely because they may not be the intended audience.

    Brand­ing effec­tive­ness should be mea­sured on ROI, whether ‘real’ dol­lars or own­er­ship of mind (the lat­ter more dif­fi­cult to measure).

    Brand work can be “appre­ci­ated”, but one would expect a ‘one size fits all’ approach to brand­ing work any­more than expect *every­one* to like Tofu.

  2. rjulian says:

    Hello Grant,

    Whether one’s tar­get is in the thou­sands or mil­lions, I believe there is a great degree of vari­abil­ity among those peo­ple, so dilut­ing work to the point that it *appeals to all* is, in our opin­ion: a) not a prac­ti­cal real­ity and b) inadvisable.

    Of course we want our brand­ing work to affect the great­est per­cent­age of our tar­get audi­ence, but inter­est­ingly I believe this occurs most when one focuses on sim­ply cre­at­ing great and res­o­nant work one strongly believes will affect an arche­typal consumer(s). We’ve found try­ing to imag­ine the per­cep­tions of mil­lions of peo­ple can par­a­lyze or crip­ple the pur­suit of great ideas. More often it’s help­ful to think about the audi­ence as a hand­ful of friends with cer­tain sets of gen­eral attrib­utes, believ­ing if we’re able to con­nect well with them, we’ll have a bet­ter chance of con­nect­ing with the larger population.

    Regard­ing an agency not being attracted to its own work, here’s how we dis­cuss it with our cre­ative teams: “If you want the per­son who sees this work to laugh, it needs to make *you* laugh. Really, truly, laugh–not some ‘I think peo­ple will find this funny’ but rather, ‘this cracks us up, and we believe it will crack oth­ers up’.” Ditto all other emo­tional responses we expect our work to pro­voke: inspi­ra­tion, hap­pi­ness, reflec­tion… Our abil­ity to suc­cess­fully con­nect with our clients’ audi­ences is directly pro­por­tional to our abil­ity to make the work to con­nect with us first. That being said, if we felt we were unable to effec­tively make that con­nec­tion, we would either part­ner with some­one who could, or sim­ply pass on the engage­ment. Emo­tional responses aren’t abstract. They are real, and the only way one can ver­ify them is to feel them.

    Of course, we’re big on cre­at­ing emo­tional con­nec­tions with our client’s audiences–it’s a core phi­los­o­phy of our brand­ing practice.

    Thanks for your comments,

    Rick

Leave a Reply